She Treads Softly: Cabinet of Curiosities

Friday, November 1, 2024

Cabinet of Curiosities

Cabinet of Curiosities by Aaron Mahnke
11/12/24; 336 pages
St. Martin's

Cabinet of Curiosities: A Historical Tour of the Unbelievable, the Unsettling, and the Bizarre by Aaron Mahnke, is the very highly recommended collection of stories from his podcast which are edited by Harry Marks.

Self described as tales of wonderful, astounding, and downright bizarre people, places, and things throughout history, these short nonfiction selections are perfect for those who like history and trivia in a quick, short, often humorous format. While familiar with many of the events/tales presented, I am unfamiliar with the podcast but immediately appreciated this collection as one that can entertain and educate.

This is one of those collections that you can pick up, read a few stories, set aside and pick it back up whenever the mood hits you. They are organized by topic, so a reader could chose to read tales from just one topic or browse through several. All the stories are truly strange and interesting pieces of history. Many of the selections are suitable for ages 10 and up. The stories are also intentionally short, so don't expect a scholarly deep dive into any one event, although you could undertake this on your own if interested.

After I read Cabinet of Curiosities, I immediately knew this is an excellent gift choice for several people. Of them, one is a trivia lover and this would become a coffee table/bathroom reader to pick up as the mood strikes. Another loves history and would likely use the stories as an impetus to looking further into a topic. Thanks to St. Martin's Press for providing me with an advance reader's copy via NetGalley. My review is voluntary and expresses my honest opinion.

No comments:

Post a Comment

John Updike's six rules for reviewing:

1. Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.

2. Give him enough direct quotation--at least one extended passage--of the book's prose so the review's reader can form his own impression, can get his own taste.

3. Confirm your description of the book with quotation from the book, if only phrase-long, rather than proceeding by fuzzy precis.

4. Go easy on plot summary, and do not give away the ending.

5. If the book is judged deficient, cite a successful example along the same lines, from the author's oeuvre or elsewhere. Try to understand the failure. Sure it's his and not yours?

To these concrete five might be added a vaguer sixth, having to do with maintaining a chemical purity in the reaction between product and appraiser.....Review the book, not the reputation.... Better to praise and share than blame and ban. The communion between reviewer and his public is based upon the presumption of certain possible joys in reading, and all our discriminations should curve toward that end.